Science writer Martin Gardner criticised the guide's "repetitious, immature fashion" likening it into the grand pseudoscientific pronouncements of Wilhelm Reich. "Practically nothing inside the book remotely resembles a scientific report," he wrote.[seven] Subscribe to The us's most significant dictionary and get 1000's far more definitions and State-of-the-art research—advert cost-free! https://scientologykreuz53951.bloggadores.com/3885071/the-definitive-guide-to-dianetic