[14] The lawful definition of sexually specific conduct does not call for that a picture depict a child engaging in sexual activity. An image of a unadorned child may possibly represent illegal child pornography whether it is sufficiently sexually suggestive.[ten] Legal professionals and lecturers have criticized the use of child https://child-porn32109.blogdanica.com/34588637/5-years-old-girl-rape-no-further-a-mystery